Off the grid & off the pipe…in San Francisco
Posted on | August 9, 2009 | No Comments
This is a post from Green Architecture Notes published by Feldman Architecture out in San Francisco. It describes an energy-neutral house proposed to be constructed next year.
With all the building trends moving towards sustainability here in New York City, it is still SO MUCH more difficult to do a net-zero house here than in the Bay Area.
For one thing, our buildings are generally taller with smaller footprints so the proportion of available roof area (for renewable energy) to living area is much smaller. Also, our winters are colder and our summers hotter and more humid so we use much more energy for heating and cooling. Not to make excuses but a net-zero house here is kind of like the holy grail.
Given that we’re comparing climates, I thought I’d take this opportunity to introduce the concept of degree days which are a useful tool to compare climates or assess energy efficiency strategies.
There are many ways to calculate degree days. The simplest formula is to subtract 65 degrees from the average daily temperature. If the number is greater than zero, it is equivalent to that number of cooling degree days (CDD), if the number is less than zero, it is equivalent to that number of heating degree days (HDD).
For example. Today’s high was 82 and low was 76. The average temperature is 79 degrees. 79 degrees minus 65 degrees = 14 cooling degree days. You can conveniently add them up to get monthly and seasonal totals and compare different climates or different time periods within the same climate.
For comparison purposes, I downloaded the last 12 month’s heating degree days and cooling degree days for San Franciso and New York City from degreedays.net.
As you can see, New York City has much higher number of heating and cooling degree days which means that a building in New York City would need to use more energy for heat and cooling to maintain the same comfort level as would a comparable building in the Bay Area.
You can also use this information to assess recent energy efficiency improvements.
You would adjust the post-improvement annual energy consumption with the pre-improvement consumption by degree days in order to compare “apples to apples”.
For example, if you are thinking that the extra insulation you added last fall didn’t work as well as you thought, it could be that we just had a colder winter so your bills were higher than you might have expected, even with the added insulation. The chart below shows that the 08/09 winter (in green) was, in fact, colder than the 07/08 winter (shown in blue).
Comments
Leave a Reply





